General Election 2024: the Uniparty or else?
Will enough voters say 'Neither Labour nor Tory' to try and effect real, lasting change?
So an unelected Hindu Prime Minister has ‘agreed by mutual consent’ to stand down from his ceremonial role as Chief Communications Officer, UK.
Strangely, the man most capable of ensuring that the Prime Minister’s party be absolutely annihilated, Nigel Farage, has decided not to stand, citing ‘a desire to cover US politics this year’. Presumably the Nigel Farage roadshow is more important than the Governance of the UK?
The Liberal Democrats and the Greens, fervent zealots promoting the Net Zero economic suicide pact will doubtless be ‘up for it’.
And the UK’s most outspoken rebel, George Galloway, has organised his ‘Workers Party’ to stand in 500 seats, being the only ‘anti-war-in-Gaza’ option on the ballot paper, save Independents.
But of course, the Global Cabal of World Leaders had already deemed that Keir Starmer was their next CCO, UK. He married a Jew, brings up his children Jewish, stated publicly that Israel could starve Gazans to death, cut off their water supply, bomb their hospitals, prevent food aid entering Gaza etc etc. ‘I believe in genocides as long as the right people commit them’ should be the epitaph on Starmer’s grave.
Keir Starmer was fully supportive of the Covid19 lockdown nonsense, arguing for even more draconian lockdowns than were actually enforced. Since the biggest victims of lockdowns were children of the less well off, for him to try and say that he represents ordinary working people is the sort of lie that earned politicians the well-deserved epitaph of ‘You know he’s lying because his lips moved’.
Keir Starmer is no war leader, he is no military general, he is the sort of ‘human rights lawyer’ that makes you think about hiring a lawyer that represented the United Fruit Company. At least they were honest about their priorities….
Keir Starmer does not represent any significant change in direction. He will do what the USA tells him to do, support war against Russia, keep on giving Israel Western cover for their crimes against humanity in Gaza. And he will keep on letting in over half a million immigrants every year.
At least he will if he has a majority of 200 in the House of Commons.
I gave up on the political Establishment at National Level several years ago.
I don’t believe that pandering to Israel nor to Jews in the UK should be anywhere near the top of a democratic leader’s priority list. Jews represent 0.5% of the electorate, a pitiful niche group. If he panders to them but ridicules white British men, then not only is he not democratic, he is blatantly racist and anti-democratic. What white British men think matters at least 50 times more than what Jews think, because there are 50 times as many British White men as there are British Jews.
The same should be said about trans-sexuals. They are a strident minority totally unrepresentative of the heterosexual majority. The views of heterosexuals should be prioritised by democratic leaders, whose job is to safeguard the rights of minorities, not to impose the dogma of radical minorities onto the majority.
The same should be said about the pathetic ‘taking the knee’ that Starmer so visibly partook in. I won’t do what radical black racists order me to do and anyone espousing Critical Race Theory will get a short, sharp shock from me and thousands like me. We are NOT a racist country, have assimilated blacks far better than America ever did and we are sick and tired of ‘outrage, outrage’ black whiners looking for any excuse to cry ‘racism, racism!’ Anyone watching the BBC knows that blacks get far, far more slots on the TV station we have to pay for upon pain of criminal prosecution than they are worthy of. There are far more black players earning millions in the EPL than is warranted by their population in this country. We don’t need a black woman AND a black homosexual on the same panel, when there is no white man present.
What people should prioritise when choosing who to vote for in this General Election should be the following:
Will our representative speak out for local people in Parliament, even if it causes them to ‘speak truth unto power’?
Will our representative be sufficiently educated on key issues like climate change, medical vaccines, pharmaceutical law, foreign policy, financial crime, non-governmental agency control of elected officials to actually be capable of doing their job as an MP?
Does our Representative actually believe in the Nation State?
Does our Representative think that autocrats like William Gates III are fit and proper people to try and take global decisions without democratic accountability?
Does our Representative think that doctors joining the Security Services are not capable of putting human health before personal greasy pole climbing?
Does our Representative wish to spend more time amongst the populace rather than in the non-representative ‘Westminster Village’ bubble?
There are of course going to be particular triggers for different voters, but this election is about one thing and one thing alone: do you think that voting is about choosing who the ringmasters tell us to choose or about choosing people precisely because they have NOT been chosen by the ringmasters?
Depending on how many people decide on the latter will determine whether Keir Starmer has a landslide victory, whether there is a hung Parliament or whether, in the most seismic election in UK history, both major parties have an absolute meltdown of the first order.
Nothing would make me happier than seeing both Labour and Conservative parties with less than 180 seats each.
I realise that isn’t the most likely outcome, but it does tell readers that I don’t want Keir Starmer as Prime Minister, doesn’t it?